Athens

How to Proofread with AI: A Complete Guide

- Moritz Wallawitsch

Search "how to proofread with AI" and you will find twenty articles that all say the same thing: paste your text into Grammarly, fix the red underlines, done. That is not proofreading. That is spell-checking with extra steps.

Real proofreading goes deeper. It catches the paragraph that repeats what you said two paragraphs ago. It flags the sentence that starts with "There are" when a stronger verb exists. It finds the pronoun that could refer to three different nouns. It notices you switched from past tense to present tense in the middle of a section.

AI can do all of this now. But most people use it badly, because most guides treat AI proofreading as a grammar problem. It is not. It is an editing problem. And the difference matters.

What AI Proofreading Actually Catches

Grammar and spelling are table stakes. Every tool catches those. The interesting question is what AI can catch beyond the basics.

Passive Voice

"The report was written by the team" versus "The team wrote the report." Passive voice hides the actor. Sometimes that is intentional. Usually it is lazy. AI reliably flags passive constructions and suggests active alternatives. This alone tightens most writing by 10-15%.

Orwell put this in his six rules for writing : "Never use the passive where you can use the active." AI makes following that rule automatic.

Wordiness

"Due to the fact that" means "because." "In order to" means "to." "At this point in time" means "now." English is full of phrases that use five words where one would do. AI catches these consistently.

The best AI tools do not just flag wordy phrases. They rewrite the sentence to be shorter. You see the before and after side by side and decide if the shorter version works.

Unclear Pronoun References

"John told Mike that he needed to revise his draft." Who needs to revise whose draft? AI flags ambiguous pronouns that you stop noticing after you have read your own text three times. Fresh eyes, even artificial ones, catch what yours skip.

Inconsistent Tense

You start a section in past tense, switch to present in the third paragraph, and do not notice. AI does. This is especially useful in long documents where tense drift happens over pages, not paragraphs.

Redundant Sentences

You made a point in paragraph two. You made the same point in paragraph seven with different words. In a 3,000-word piece, this happens more often than you think. AI catches semantic repetition, not just repeated words. It flags when you are saying the same thing twice.

Weak Openings

"It is important to note that..." "There are several reasons why..." "It should be mentioned that..." These throat-clearing phrases push the actual content further from the reader. AI flags them and suggests starting with the real point instead.

Klinkenborg calls these "prefabricated phrases" in Several Short Sentences About Writing. They feel like writing. They are filler.

Cliches

"At the end of the day," "moving the needle," "low-hanging fruit," "think outside the box." These phrases signal that you stopped thinking and grabbed the nearest available expression. AI flags them. Whether you replace them is up to you, but at least you will know they are there.

What AI Cannot Catch

AI proofreading has real limits. Knowing them prevents you from trusting it too much.

Factual errors. AI does not fact-check. If you write that the Treaty of Versailles was signed in 1920, most AI proofreading tools will not flag it. They process language patterns, not truth. Never rely on AI to verify claims, dates, statistics, or quotes.

Argument quality. AI cannot tell you if your argument holds. It can tell you if a sentence is grammatically correct. It cannot tell you if the conclusion follows from the premises. Logic is your job.

Voice preservation. This is the biggest risk. Aggressive AI proofreading flattens distinctive writing into generic corporate prose. If you accept every suggestion without thinking, you will sand off the edges that make your writing yours. Your sentence fragments might be intentional. Your one-word paragraph might be a stylistic choice. AI does not know the difference between a mistake and a choice.

The fix: use AI proofreading tools that show you exactly what they changed, so you can accept the good suggestions and reject the ones that flatten your voice.

The Best AI Proofreading Tools in 2026

Not all tools approach proofreading the same way. Some fix grammar. Some rewrite sentences. Some show you diffs. The right tool depends on what kind of proofreading you need.

  1. Athens

Athens is built for writers who want AI editing, not AI writing. You write in a clean markdown editor. You select text and ask AI to improve it. Athens shows you a diff of every change - green for additions, red for deletions - so you see exactly what the AI did before you accept anything.

This matters for proofreading because the whole point is staying in control. You do not want a tool that silently rewrites your sentences. You want a tool that proposes changes and lets you decide. Athens treats AI edits like a code review for your prose. You accept, reject, or modify each suggestion.

Beyond grammar, Athens catches the deeper issues: passive voice, wordiness, unclear references, weak openings, redundant paragraphs. It does not just underline problems. It rewrites the text and shows you the difference.

Best for: Writers who care about their voice and want to see every change before it happens.

2. Grammarly

Grammarly is the default. It works everywhere - Gmail, Google Docs, Slack, browser text fields. For grammar, spelling, and punctuation, it is reliable. The free tier covers the basics. The premium tier adds clarity suggestions, tone detection, and style guides.

The limitation: Grammarly tends to homogenize writing. It pushes everything toward a corporate-friendly default. If you write with a distinctive voice, Grammarly will try to smooth it out. It does not show you diffs. It shows you suggestions inline, and many users develop the habit of accepting everything without reading carefully.

Best for: Quick grammar checks in emails and short documents.

3. ProWritingAid

ProWritingAid generates detailed reports on your writing. Readability scores, sentence length variation, overused words, pacing analysis, dialogue tags. It gives you more data about your writing than any other tool.

The depth is impressive but can be overwhelming. You get twenty reports and fifteen categories of suggestions. For book-length projects, the reports are genuinely useful. For a blog post, you probably do not need a pacing analysis.

Best for: Fiction writers and long-form authors who want deep analytics.

4. Hemingway Editor

Hemingway does one thing: readability. It highlights hard-to-read sentences, flags passive voice, counts adverbs, and gives you a grade level. No AI rewriting. No suggestions. Just highlights.

The simplicity is the point. If you want a fast visual scan of where your prose gets dense, Hemingway shows you in seconds. It will not fix anything for you. It assumes you know how to rewrite a sentence once you know it is too long.

Best for: Writers who just want readability feedback without AI touching their text.

5. ChatGPT or Claude

You can paste your text into ChatGPT or Claude and ask for proofreading feedback. The AI will give you a list of issues with explanations. This works surprisingly well for catching structural problems, unclear arguments, and inconsistencies that grammar checkers miss.

The problem is the workflow. You copy text out of your document, paste it into a chat window, read the feedback, go back to your document, and make the changes manually. For one pass, this is fine. For real proofreading - which takes multiple passes - the copy-paste loop gets tedious fast.

Best for: One-off feedback on specific sections when you do not have a dedicated tool.

6. Wordtune

Wordtune rewrites sentences. Select a sentence, and it gives you several alternative versions. You pick the one that sounds best. It is more about sentence-level rewriting than whole-document proofreading.

The rewrites are often good. The limitation is scope. Wordtune works sentence by sentence. It does not catch document-level issues like redundant paragraphs, inconsistent tense across sections, or structural problems. Think of it as a sentence polisher, not a proofreader.

Best for: Improving individual sentences when you know what you want to say but cannot find the right words.

How to Proofread with AI (The Right Way)

Tools matter less than process. Here is how to actually proofread with AI without losing control of your writing.

Finish your draft first. Do not proofread while writing. These are different mental modes. Writing is generative. Proofreading is critical. Mixing them slows both down. Get the full draft on the page before you start fixing it.

Do a manual read first. Read your draft once without any tools. Mark the sections that feel off. You will catch things AI will not - places where the argument is weak, where the transition feels forced, where you lost the thread. Your instincts are data. Use them.

Run AI on the full document. Do not proofread paragraph by paragraph. AI catches more when it sees the whole piece. Redundancy across sections, tense inconsistency, repeated words five paragraphs apart. Give it the full context.

Review every change. This is the step most people skip. Do not bulk-accept AI suggestions. Read each one. Ask: does this change improve the writing, or does it flatten it? Does the rewritten sentence still sound like you? Did the AI remove a deliberate choice?

Make multiple passes. First pass: grammar and spelling. Second pass: clarity and concision. Third pass: style and voice. Each pass has a different focus. Doing everything at once means you miss things.

Read it out loud after. After accepting AI changes, read the final version out loud. Your ear catches rhythm problems that your eyes skip. If a sentence sounds awkward when spoken, it will read awkward too.

The Key Principle: You Stay in Control

The biggest mistake people make with AI proofreading is treating it as an authority. It is not. It is a suggestion engine. A fast, tireless, sometimes-wrong suggestion engine.

Good AI proofreading tools make this easy by showing you exactly what changed. You see the original text. You see the proposed edit. You decide. That is the whole workflow.

Bad AI proofreading tools make changes silently or bury the diff in a wall of text. You end up accepting things you did not understand because reading the suggestions takes more effort than the tool saves.

Your writing should sound like you after proofreading, not like a machine. The grammar should be correct. The sentences should be clear. But the voice, the rhythm, the choices that make your writing yours - those should survive.

AI is the best proofreading partner most writers have ever had. It is tireless, fast, and catches things human eyes miss. But it is a partner, not a boss. The best proofreading happens when you use AI to see your writing more clearly - and then you make the final call on every change.

Try Athens

  • AI editing with diffs that show every change, so you stay in control of your writing.